The Soviet Union after Lenin
The Soviet Union after Lenin
The following texts are the property of their respective authors and we thank them for giving us the opportunity to share for free to students, teachers and users of the Web their texts will used only for illustrative educational and scientific purposes only.
The information of medicine and health contained in the site are of a general nature and purpose which is purely informative and for this reason may not replace in any case, the council of a doctor or a qualified entity legally to the profession.
The Soviet Union after Lenin
The Soviet Union after Lenin, 1924-41
Power Struggle  1924-28
  Roles of Stalin, Kamenev, Trotsky and Zinoviev
  Different  views on how to deal with the NEP.  Those on the right wanted to keep the NEP so gradual industrialisation would  happen while those on the left wanted immediate industrialisation.
  Repress  Lenin’s testament which insults all the leading Bolsheviks. Trotsky’s missed  opportunity to stop Lenin? Lenin’s wife wants Trotsky to show the testament,  but he doesn’t!
  At  Lenin’s funeral Stalin makes himself key player and Trotsky doesn’t even go!
  Zinoviev  and Kamenev attack Trotsky for his arrogance etc. Trotsky’s retorts with  “lessons of October” article which attacks their bureaucratisation.
  Stalin  is in background at time not involving himself with any of it.
  Trotsky  is made out to be a major threat and is seen as unappealing as he could cause  splits in party. Trotsky is seen as very arrogant and power hungry.
  Unlike  the left and the right ends of the Bolshevik Party, Stalin did not have one  overall ideology to begin with. He adapted his policies to fit the mood of the  time.
Importance of doctrine of “Socialism in one  Country”
  Stalin  believed in Socialism in one Country while Trotsky supported Permanent  Revolution.
  Permanent  Revolution believed that communist USSR could not succeed unless more  revolutions abroad happened. The working class in USSR  was to small and needed support from the wider w/c in industrialised Europe.
  Socialism  in One Country meant an acceptance that world-wide communist revolution was  unlikely to happen in the immediate future and so the USSR had to  build their state without help from other countries. Meant showing the rest of  the world how good socialism could be. This theory appealed to nationalism and  patriotism of the Soviet people.
  Was  idealism vs pragmatism.
  In  Politburo Socialism in one Country won by 4 votes to 3.
Link between the power struggle and how power was  exercised in this revolutionary state – ie structure of party politics
  There  had never been a communist country before Russia and so there were no  guidelines of how it should be done. This meant that the government was  learning as they went along.
  1921  there had been a ban on factions. This meant once a decision is made in the  Politburo the rest of the party has to agree with it. If Stalin dominates the  Politburo NO ONE can challenge him.
  Two  main features of government in Soviet Russia by 1924: Council of People’s  Commissars (like cabinet) and the Secretariat (like the civil service). Both of  these staffed by Bolshevik party.
  This  growth in scope meant certain positions that seemed unimportant actually held a  lot of power. Stalin positions had far more power than ANYONE thought:
  àCommissar for  Nationalities (1917) meant he was in charge of officials in the outer regions  of USSR.
  àLiaison Officer  between Politburo and Orgburo (1919) meant he could monitor Party policy and  personnel.
  àHead of the  Workers’ and Peasants’ Inspectorate (1919) meant he oversaw work of all the  government departments.
  àGeneral  Secretary of the Communist (Bolshevik) Party (1922) meant he recorded and  conveyed all party policy and so could build up information on.
  1923-25  there had been the Lenin enrolment. This was a membership drive which had  drastically changed the make up of the Bolshevik party. The new members did not  care about ideology but wanted the socio-economic advantages if being a  Bolshevik. They were loyal to Stalin, not the party. In 1922 340,000 and by  1925 600,000 members.
  Trotsky  never viewed Stalin as a rival and so when it became apparent he was, it was to  late.
  Always  a worry that after Lenin’s death a dictatorship would emerge. Most people were  worried about Trotsky filling this role.
  Stalin  had control over the delegates and at the 25th Congress and had a  victory on every issue debated.
  Zinoviev,  Trotsky and Kamenev formed the “United Opposition” to challenge Stalin’s  position. This was factionalism THOUGH! So their powers were removed.
  Zinoviev  and Kamenev are replaced by Molotov and Kirov.
How far Lenin’s legacy and wishes motivated those  involved in the struggle
  All  potential successors defended their actions in the name of Lenin.
  After  defeat of the left, there is discussion of best way to industrialise.
  Bukharin,  Tomsky and Rykov wanted to continue with the NEP whereas Stalin wanted rapid  industrialisation and collectivisation (what the left originally wanted!!).
  The  right had their positions removed.
  In  1929 at Stalin’s 50th the right confessed their errors.
Extent to which, one he had gained power, Stalin  sustained or subverted the Bolshevik ideology
  Cult  of Leninànot what Lenin  would have wanted but is a way for Stalin to gain power.
  Stalin’s  individualistic leadership principle destroyed what Lenin had wanted.
  Many  believe that when Stalin introduced his economic policies was when the Soviet Union went “wrong.
How Stalin  established a wide degree of political control
  Use of Propaganda, the party machine and methods of  terror (including the Purges) to suppress opposition
  1932-Ryutin  Platform-opposition to Stalin. Ryutin was not killed though, the rest of the  Politburo would not allow it. Showed Stalin did not have complete power yet.
  Different  stages of the purges:
  -Chistka  (1932-35)-20% of party expelled (not through violence). Mainly members who were  illiterate or inactive. Many local Bolshevik leaders did not like carrying out  the extreme methods Stalin was calling out for and so this allowed for a  re-establishment of party control.
  February  1934-17th Party Congress-Was nicknamed “Congress of Victors” as it  was claimed that the economy had recovered. Kirov seems as if he could defeat Stalin.
  December  1934-Kirov’s assassinated. This leads to the escalation in the purges as  Stalin’s claims it shows how Trotsky was trying to defeat the government.
  A  couple of hours after Kirov’s  death Decree Against Terrorist Act is put in place.
  -Show  trials-prominent Old Bolsheviks publicly tried and executed.
  January  1935-Zinoviev and Kamenev arrested for instigating terrorist activities.
  June  1935-Death penalty extended to include people who were aware spies etc.
  August  1936-first show trial involving Zinoviev, Kamenev and 14 others.
  September  1936-Yezhov new head of NKVD.
  December  1936-new constitution.
  January  1937-second show trial.
  -Yezhovshchina  (1937-38)-named after head of NKVD (Yezhov). Period of the mass purges.  Thousands of party members and other people denounced. They were executed or  sent to gulag.
  May  1937-purge of the red army begins.
  June  1937-leading army officers are shot as they are supposedly part of a plot to  help foreign powers overthrow Stalin.
  March  1938-Third show trial involving Bukharin, Rykov, Yagoda and 18 others.
  December  1938-Beria replaces Yezhov as head of NKVD.
  March1939-Stalin  calls an end to the mass purges.
  February  1940-Yezhov is shot.
  Perhaps  most shocking about the show trials was that they admitted their crimes. This  was partly due to their families being threatened and also it was “beaten” out  of them.
Controversy surrounding the cause and nature of the  different purges
  Reasons  for purges escalating/happening:
  Totalitarian:
  -Stalin  planned the purges to achieve total power/success of his economic plans. He  needs to enforce his economic plans. He needed workers for his gulags.
  -Stalin  had to remove his opposition. Ryutin Platform, Trotskyites. Kirov assassination used to show opposition  to Bolsheviks in general and could be used to show opposition to Stalin. By  keeping party in a constant fear of terror
  -Stalin  paranoidàpurges. Stalin  said to Khrushchev he did not trust anybody. He kills the army and the NKVDàirrational, he needs them (especially with war  coming up!).
  -The  purges derive from the tradition of Leninism and communism. Communism about a  revolutionary spirit and Stalin is just keeping that alive. Lenin also purged  the party.
  -Stalin  narcissistic and paranoid.
  Revisionist:
  -People  wanted to save themselves by denouncing othersàmore  victims.
  -NKVD  over fulfil their targets.
  -Usually  the “bottom” denounced those at the top. Could be out of spite or out of ambition.
  -More  people you denounce the safer you are.
  -Army  could not be completely trusted.
  -Purges  were unplanned, and were just reactions to events that happened. The unstable  economy and threat of war meant people had to be pushed into working.
  -Other  leaders and agencies helped shape the purges. NKVD were concerned they were  going to lose power (with slow down of FYP and collectivisation) and so the  purges raised their profile.
  -The  Purges took on a life of their own. Workers were more than happy to blame their  bosses for not completing targets. The lower levels of the party were  encouraged to criticise the higher members. Managers also needed to find people  for blame for target failures so were quite happy to accuse people of being  “saboteurs”.
Results  of purges:
  -70%  of Central Committee elected at 17th party Congress shot.
  -1108  of 1966 delegates at 17th Party Congress arrested.
  -Huge  amounts in army purged (not very clever with war coming…).
  -23,000  NKVD. The NKVD had the highest casualty rate.
Controversies  about the purges:
  -When  did they start? Always happening? Or from 1936 onwards?
  -Totalitarian  of revisionist?
  -Incomplete  evidence.
  -Time  in which historian is writingàcold  war, glasnost?
  -Political  or ideological perspective, is the historian sympathetic to communism?
Political and social bases of Stalin’s power
  Many  young people were dedicated and felt they were building socialism.
Reasons his rule was popular among many political,  economic and social groups and bitterly opposed by others
  Collectivisation  had effectively alienated the peasantry.
  “Former  people” such as priests, industrialists and traders hated the regime.
  Many  inside the Bolshevik party disagreed with the extreme and violent methods  Stalin advocated. Many Bolsheviks committed suicide (including Stalin’s own  wife).
Modernisation  Programme
  Stalin’s perception of the backwardness of the Soviet Union compared to industrialised nations in the  West and how this influenced his economic thinking
  By  end of 1920s seemed industry was not growing anymore.
  By  1927 relations with France, Poland, Britain  and Japan  were not looking good and so a strong armaments base was needed. To fight a  “modern” war an industrialised economy was needed.
  There  was always lingering paranoia, as the USSR was the only communist state.  Had been signs of threats as well: Nationalists attack communists in China and a Russian diplomat assassinated in Poland.
  Industrialisation  seen as patriotic thing.
  1929    Wall Street Crash, so  could not rely on trade.
  The  USSR  needed to be more self sufficient as it could not rely on the outside world.
  “We  are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make this  distance in ten years. Either we do it, or we shall be crushed” – Stalin.
Five Year Plans drafted by Gosplan
  State  control meant the government would have direct control over production and  distribution of materials.
  Industrialisation  would create a strong proletariatàneeded  for socialism!
  Extended  states powers.
  The  centralised planning was not always a positive thing though. It did not often  take local conditions into account and led to breakdown in communication  between those at the top and bottom.
  Often  meant a waste of resources.
  The  unrealistic targets led to theft and faking records.
  Targets  were set but no direction was given on how to achieve them.
Three Five Year Plans of 1928-32, 1933-37, 1938-41  – different emphases, ideology which underpinned them and degree of success  which they achieved
  First Five Year Plan
  Announced  December 1927 at 15th Party Congress.
  It  was received warmly, many Bolsheviks never really liked the NEP and so the  “great turn” was positively received. It seemed like a significant step forward  in the revolution.
  It  was more a set of production figures rather than a plan.
  Aimed  for mass, quick industrialisation.
  Emphasis  on quantity (gigantomania) rather than quality.
  Emphasis  on INDUSTRIALISATION.
  Mass  increases of workers and increases in coal, iron and electoral power.
  Figures  are very unreliable though as people LIED!
  The  huge increases in workers was not all good either as many of these workers were  not trained properly.
  1500  new factories created.
  Size  of industrial working class doubled.
  Second Five Year Plan
  Targets  more realistic.
  Heavy  industry was still a priority.
  Also  focused on railways and transportation.
  Saw  a huge rise in steel production but not in important areas like coal and oil.
  Introduction  of more training programmes.
  Third Five Year Plan
  Ended  when Russia  entered WW2.
  Increase  in state spending.
Economic policies – decision to end the NEP; collectivisation  in agriculture, rapid industrialisation and urban development
  Agriculture
  Under  the NEP the peasants were not creating enough grain for the industrialisation  plans. Not enough grain was being created to export and so there was not enough  money to expand the outdated Soviet technology.
  Reasons  for the lack of growth in grain production were; agriculture very backwards;  land owned by peasants was very small and often peasants only produced enough  for themselves.
  Initially,  to solve this problem, in 1926 the government started collecting money tax  (instead of tax in the form of grain) from the peasants and also clamped down  on the private traders buying food off the peasants. This meant that the  peasants needed to sell more to pay the tax. But peasants felt little point in  having money as there was nothing to buy! Also they started with holding  produce to try and raise the state prices for food.
  In  1928 there was a famine and so requisitioning squads went out to seize food  from the peasants. Created VERY bad relationship between the government and the  peasants.
  15th  Party Congress collectivisation drafter up. The peasants would not become good  socialists and therefore FORCE was needed.
  The  peasants had all the power under the NEP, and the Bolsheviks HATED it.
  Collectivisation  was meant to; modernise agriculture; help industrialisation by providing food  to the cities; create more exports; create more workers as collectivised farms  will need less farmers; build socialism in the countryside by eliminating  kulaks and providing a socialist system.
  Collectivisation  put peasants into kolkhozy (collective farms) and sovkhozy (state farms). Both  the type of farms had the intention of making agriculture serve the state.  Farms would consist of what had previously been 50-100 independent farms.
  Collectivisation  was meant to be voluntarily, but in reality it was forced.
  To  encourage support Stalin demonised a group of people called the “kulaks”. They  were meant to be peasants who got wealthy off the NEP. Many peasants were happy to  agree with Stalin as they felt like they had been exploited. In reality kulaks  did not really exist.
  De-kulakisation  was put into motion and wealthier peasants were arrested and their land seized.
  From  December 1929-March 1930 about ¼ of all farms were collectivised and by end of  1930s virtually all farms collectivised
  Stage  One-Emergency Measures-January 1928 the Politburo votes for emergency measures  that allowed grain to be confiscated by force.
  Stage  Two-The Urals-Siberian method-November 1928 approved by Central Committee.  Villages asked to point out kulaks, villages would receive 25% of the grain  seized.
  Stage  Three (I)-Forced Collectivisation-Summer 1929 Collective Farm Centre set up.  November 1929 call from Central Committee for speed in collectivisation.  January 1929 complete collectivisation by autumn 1930. Collectivisation was  meant to voluntary!!
  Stage  Three (II)-Dekulakisation-Three punishments for kulaks; imprisonment or  shooting; transported to North; given poor land to farm.
  Stage  Three (III)-Peasant Opposition-Many peasants were unwilling to denounce their  fellow villagers. Communists attacked churches, which made them seem to the  villagers as if they were immoral.
  Stage  Four-The Party Retreats-2 March 1930 Stalin writes article “dizzy with  success”. It criticised the extreme measures some party members were taking to  enforce collectivisation (despite Stalin telling them to do so!). He asks for a  return to voluntary collectivisation. February 1930 60% collectivised and by  August 1930 drop to 30%.
  Stage  Five-Collectivisation resumed-Peasants were allowed to have their own small  patch of land. Farms got controlled by Motor-Tractor Stations (MTS) and they  decided how much wage/grain each peasant got. Potemkin villages were set up as  showcases.
  Stage  Six-Famine 1932-34-Hit Ukraine  and Volga hardest. Many collective farms just  collapsed as there were not enough people to work on them. Measures were taken  to prevent the peasants travelling so people could not see what a mess was  going on.
  Stage  Seven-Consolidation-1935 Part Congress new model for collective farms. Private  plots of about 1.2 a hectare for each kolkoznik household.
  Collectivisation  was not effective as hoped though as many of the peasants would not co-operate.  Lots of peasants destroyed their own crops so they would not have to hand them  over to the state. In particular fall in livestock.
  Stalin  sent image out to Russia  that collectivisation was working but in reality HUGE famine. As no one was  allowed to know about the famine, they could get no aid. Millions die.
  Collectivisation  was DISASTER; no grain surplus was produced and so none could be sold abroad;  food production did not meet demand; by 1939 production just met 1913 levelsàLIKE THE NEP!
  Peasants  had no insensitive to produce large amounts of extra grain, productivity on  private farms were far greater than in collectivised.
  Was  it worth the cost of millions of lives? Hard to find accurate stat as no one  was paying attention to countryside. More deaths than in WW1.
  Did  see huge increase in population in cities thoughàurban  population increased by 12 million.
  Introduction  of tractors increased efficiency BUT not a large amount of these and they were  often not used and were in bad condition.
  Procurement  rose from 18.2m in 1928-32 to 27.5m in 1933-37.
  Success  in sense that almost all farms were collectivised by end of 1930s.
  At  time did appear successful as people were unaware of the famine in the  countryside.
  Workers-industrialisation
  Unemployment  was still high under the NEP.  This especially effected women who were pushed out of their jobs after the  civil was because of returning red army. Low wages did not keep up with prices  of consumer goods so having a job was hardly worth it.
  The  NEP had not created a “workers” society, by 1928 only 20% of the population  were workers.
  December  1927-15th Party Congress-announced First Five Year Plan. The NEP was  creating “worst” type of society full of private traders, kulaks and nepmen.
  Positive  feeling towards industrialisation; feeling that they were building socialism  and removing the corrupt capitalism; feeling of making history; want to show  the wider world how good socialism is.
  Gigantomania-doing  everything on a HUGE scale.
  Problems  with the plans where that the new workers were often unskilled peasants and so  often destroyed new machinery. In 1931 estimated that only 7% workforce  skilled.
  Workers  did not stay in factories for long, particularly the skilled ones. In 1931  average stay for a worker 82 days.
  To  solve these problems wage differentials introduced to workers who stayed in one  place (NOT COMMUNIST!). Payment was also offered by the amount a worker  produced.
  More  harsh measures introduced for absenteeism (in 1940 it becomes a crime).
  1938  internal passports introduced.
  April  1930 all prisoners sentenced for more than 3 years go to labour camps.
  Was  a huge growth; increase in production of raw materials; railways and canals  built rapid urbanisationàMoscow  grew from 2.2m in 1929 to 3.6m in 1936 (was this ruralisation though?; huge  increase in electricity production; new industrial towns like Magnitogorsk.
Affect on living standards of emphasis on  production rather than consumption
  Were  improvements; wages increased for skilled workers; rationing abolished in 1936;  stakhanovite workers gained better housing/wages; more opportunities for work;  some industrial enterprises set up their won shops, bakeries and canteens; some  increases in production of footwear and food processing; better public  transport.
  Many  hardships though; women had far less opportunities than men; lack of consumer  goods; housing very poor, especially in the new cities (e.g Magnitogorsk only  15% workers lived in brick buildings, 25% lived in mud huts); shops lacked  basic commodities; real wages didn’t increase; sense of fear because of the  purges; famine; overcrowded cities with poor sanitation, water shortages and  high levels of violence and crime; new towns lacked basic infrastructure of  roads etc.
  In  context of world where a depression is happeningàperhaps  more impressive
Policies for the family, religion, health and  education
  Women/family
  Cultural  Revolution
  Familyàbourgeois element of society and therefore needed  to be destroyed!
  Women  seen as equal.
  Women’s  branch of communist party set up.
  Divorce  and abortion made easier and incest, bigamy and adultery were legalised.
  Quota  system meant that 20% of university places were saved for women.
  By  1934 abortions outnumbered births.
  In  Moscow in 1934  out of every 100 marriages there were 37 divorces.
  Because  of the family being broken up the amount of orphans rose greatlyàincrease in juvenile crime.
  Great  Retreat
  Wanted  to increase birth rate and for family to be important again.
  Abortion  became outlawed and divorces were made much harder.
  Zhentodel  closed in 1930 as claimed “women’s issues solved”.
  Awards  are given to mothers who have lots of children.
  In  1936 male homosexuality is declared illegal.
  “Free  marriages” banned and couples had to again register with the government.
  Women  workers rose from 3m in 1928 to 13m in 1940.
  Birth  rate rose to 31 per 1000 in 1940.
  Divorce  to marriage ratio did not improve that much.
Religion
  Cultural  Revolution
  Wanted  to wipe out religion as it provides an alternative ideology.
  From  1929 congregations and places of worship needed to be registered with the  government.
  In  the new cities and towns churches were not allowed to be built.
  Allowed  abortion and divorce (what church did not want).
  By  1930 80% of churches were closed.
  Great  Retreat
  Increase  in aim to wipe out religion.
  BUT  after Nazi invasion hostility towards the church relaxed. Worried that if  hostility continued towards church then Russian society would side with Hitler.
  1936-39  wave of arrests of bishops.
  1941-Only  5665 priests left of 60,000.
  Head  of Moscow became a bishop.
  By  end of 1930s only 1 in 40 churches functioning as churches.
  Although  a restriction of worship this did not stop people denouncing their faith.  People still worshipped in secret.
Health
Youth/education
  Cultural  Revolution
  Educate  the youth in communist ideology, breakdown the bureaucracy of teaching and  provide more opportunity for the working classes.
  A  shift to focus education on practical skills.
  Non-communist  teachers were denounced by the Komsomal.
  Uniform  and timetables were removed and more technical and scientific learning was  introduced.
  Quota  system introduced to provide 70% of university places for working classes (this  was only met once!).
  Schools  were linked to factories so students could do “socially useful work”.
  Teaching  of communist ideology became compulsory.
  Juvenile  crime increased due to lack of discipline.
  In  many areas of the USSR  teaching collapsed as so many teachers were removed.
  Great  Retreat
  Undo  the damage from previous policies.
  Uniform,  timetables, exams and discipline reintroduced in schools.
  Links  with the factories were removed.
  April  1935-Juvenile violent crime became punished by death (although this never  happened to any child).
  Quota  system removed.
  By  1940 Komsomal had 10.2m members.
  Opportunities  for w/c were still better than they were in 1928.
| CASE    STUDY | 
Propaganda
  Means by which Stalin tried to portray policies in  favourable light e.g cult of personality
  Cult  of Personality-stages
  -1924-29àOrigins
  Seen  as modest successor to Lenin. Coincides with his image during the power  struggle.
  -1929-33àCult underway.
  Portraits  of Stalin with figures like Marx and Lenin make him appear next in the line of  Marxist figures.
  -1933-39àCult fully established.
  Short  Course is released exaggerating Stalin’s role in the revolution.
  Socialist  realist movement glorifies Stalin in art.
Stalin seen as benefactor, traditional defender of the people and a charismatic leader.
How these methods were attacked after Stalin’s  death
  De-Stalinisation.
Use of press, broadcasting and film, including  censorship, and of Stakhanovite movement as propaganda
  1935-Skathanovite  was worker who cut almost 16 times the normal amount. Became hero and other  workers wanted to follow in his foot steps. The movement also created far more  stress on managers though as they had to try and keep up. Led to more lies  about production. Also weakened the communists feeling!
  1936-Constitution  introduced. Gives every citizen right to vote, freedom of press, religion and  organisation. Only communists allowed to stand in elections though. Propaganda  to the West, they are impressed! Also way of distracting USSR citizens from the show trials.
“Socialist Realist” movement – how this developed  as part of building socialism, to develop notion of the “socialist hero” and to  attack artists and intellectuals who resisted the vision
  The  original Cultural Revolution attacked the old intelligentsia and the bourgeois  cultural elements. Focus on the “New Soviet Man” who was non-individualist and  worked for the greater good.
  Constructivists  used industrial imagery to represent social and economic progress.
  Bourgeois  attacked in:
  -Art  by the Association of Artists of the Revolution
  -Literature  by the Russian Association of Proletariat Writers (RAPP).
  From  mid 1931 Stalin proclaimed end of Cultural Revolution.
  April  1932-decree abolished all proletarian artistic and literary organisation.
  Socialist  Realism had to be understood about the masses, educate workers in communism and  be a good vehicle for propaganda.
  RAPP  was abolished and replaced with the Union of Writers.
  Control  of culture was increased with the Socialist Realist movement.
  As  was approached Soviet Art and Culture became more and more nationalistic.
Source : http://ciealevelresources.wikispaces.com/file/view/revision+notes+russia+lenin+to+1941.doc
Web site link: http://ciealevelresources.wikispaces.com
Google key word : The Soviet Union after Lenin file type : doc
Author : not indicated on the source document of the above text
If you are the author of the text above and you not agree to share your knowledge for teaching, research, scholarship (for fair use as indicated in the United States copyrigh low) please send us an e-mail and we will remove your text quickly.
The Soviet Union after Lenin
If you want to quickly find the pages about a particular topic as The Soviet Union after Lenin use the following search engine:
The Soviet Union after Lenin
Please visit our home page
Larapedia.com Terms of service and privacy page